Discussió:Edinson Roberto Cavani Gómez

Aquest article, o una part, prové d'una traducció de l'article sota llicència CC-BY-SA-3.0 i/o GFDL:
«Edinson Cavani» (castellà). Consulteu l'historial de la pàgina original per a conèixer la llista d'autors.

--J. G. Góngora (disc.) 04:44, 18 juny 2010 (CEST)[respon]

Apertura

The Apertura is not the Uruguayan championship and therefore should not be treated as such, not to mention the fact that if so, all other articles should be changed. Take Antonio Pacheco for instance, his Clausuras and Aperturas won are not taken into account, same thing happens with Rubén Olivera and Walter Pandiani, to name a few.190.135.4.50 (discussió) 07:31, 10 gen 2011 (CET)[respon]

Please, don't undo the edits again. The problem you are pointing out to has already been solved. If you look carefully, the Apertura is no longer linked to the Uruguayan championship and isn't treated as such any more. Is there any problem in including what he has done in the "Apertura"? Because I can't see the point in removing that information just because other players don't have it. If they don't have it, I encourage you to include the information on their corresponding articles instead of removing data from an isolated biography. ----J. G. Góngora (disc.) 17:09, 10 gen 2011 (CET)[respon]

Its not just that isnt mentioned in a few players, it is not the standard, in order to keep a homogeneous wikipedia, such standards shouldnt be ignored. The Apertura lacks in importance and therefore shouldnt be mentioned. Anyway, its your call, I wont be bother to edit it any further if it is kept this way.190.135.24.40 (discussió) 22:21, 10 gen 2011 (CET)[respon]

As far as I know, we have no policy here regarding what is supposed to be 'standard'. And I still think that this information isn't harmful at all; maybe it's not as relevant as the Uruguayan championship is, but we can keep it. If you find that there are other things to be added, feel free to do it, but removing information under the premise that isn't important is not an objective criterion, is it? Regards, ----J. G. Góngora (disc.) 22:47, 10 gen 2011 (CET)[respon]

My argument is the standard issue, its relevance isnt, being obviously nothing more than my opinion, although it is true that its not as important as the uruguayan championship. If there are no standards, then very well, keep it this way. I obviously was mistaken about the catalá wikipedia, thought it was better in that way.190.135.24.40 (discussió) 22:52, 10 gen 2011 (CET)[respon]